WEKO3
アイテム
A Modular account of a lexical item with multiple constructional realizations : The case of ar(u)(第5回コロキアム)(2002年度KUIS-CLS言語学コロキアム報告)
https://kuis.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/85
https://kuis.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/8579de6f19-7dae-4984-aa38-58df964d00aa
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
asKUIS 著作権ポリシーを参照のこと
|
Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2003-03-25 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | A Modular account of a lexical item with multiple constructional realizations : The case of ar(u)(第5回コロキアム)(2002年度KUIS-CLS言語学コロキアム報告) | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ページ属性 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||
論文名よみ | ||||||
その他のタイトル | A Modular account of a lexical item with multiple constructional realizations : The case of ar(u)(第5回コロキアム)(2002年度KUIS-CLS言語学コロキアム報告) | |||||
著者名(日) |
竹沢, 幸一
× 竹沢, 幸一 |
|||||
著者所属(日) | ||||||
筑波大学文芸・言語研究科 | ||||||
抄録(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | In this talk, I focus on constructions involving the copula ar(u) in Japanese and their counterparts in English, and pursue a modular account of them, referring crucially to the issue of have/be alternation. Specifically, I investigate four cases in Japanese in which a single lexical item yields two different grammatical uses, namely, existential/locational and possessive uses of ar(u), active and passive uses of ar(u)-perfective constructions, direct and indirect rare(ru)-passives, and "change of location" and "change of possession" uses of verbs of giving, and show that they all originate from dual syntactic properties of ar(u). To account for their cross-constructional similarities and differences uniformly, I propose that ar(u) allows two different syntactic structures; the unaccusative one and the transitive one containing a functional light verb with a special Case property that takes an external argument in its Spec and the unaccusative part of ar(u) in its complement. Furthermore, I point out that the two uses in all of these four Japanese cases correspond to the distinction between have and be in English, and provide a parametric account of some important differences between ar(u) in Japanese and have/be in English. | |||||
雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA11646516 | |||||
書誌情報 |
Scientific approaches to language 巻 2, p. 244-245, 発行日 2003-03-25 |