WEKO3
アイテム
The EPP, Unaccusativity, and the Resultative Constructions in Japanese
https://kuis.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/102
https://kuis.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/102c0903715-b727-4b57-bfc3-ac3d9b68502e
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004257245.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
asKUIS 著作権ポリシーを参照のこと
|
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2004-03-30 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | The EPP, Unaccusativity, and the Resultative Constructions in Japanese | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||
| 論文名よみ | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | The EPP, Unaccusativity, and the Resultative Constructions in Japanese | |||||
| 著者名(日) |
宮川, 繁 /
× 宮川, 繁 / |
|||||
| 著者名よみ |
ミヤガワ, シゲル /
× ミヤガワ, シゲル / |
|||||
| 著者名(英) |
MIYAGAWA, SHIGERU
× MIYAGAWA, SHIGERU× BABYONYSHEV, MARIA |
|||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| 値 | マサチューセッツ工科大学言語哲学科 | |||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| 値 | イェール大学言語学科 | |||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | MIT | |||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | Yale University | |||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | In this work in progress we explore the possibility that the EPP, which has been claimed to be "strong" universally for T, may not need to emerge when the verb is unaccusative. We present a detailed analysis of the -te aru resultative constructions in Japanese. There are two -te aru constructions, "intransitivizing" and "non-intransitivizing." It is the "intransitivinzing" construction which we claim lacks the EPP on T. The nominative object of this construction must move out of its VP/ vP, but it does not go all the way to the matrix Spec of TP. The matrix T apparently does not project a specifier, which is consistent with the idea that it does not have the EPP feature. The other resultative construction, "non-intransitivizing," is a subject-to-subject raising construction and the T does have the EPP. While we do not attempt in this paper to try to explain the root of this difference between the two resultative constructions, it is possible that the difference is pointing to some fundamental property of the EPP which has yet to be discovered. | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11646516 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
Scientific approaches to language 巻 3, p. 159-185, 発行日 2004-03-30 |
|||||
